Basement Remodeling Meta Ads in New Jersey: $853 Spend, 4 Booked Estimates

Niche: high-ticket residential basement remodeling
Market: New Jersey, homeowners in the top 5-10% ZIP codes
Channel: Meta Ads (Facebook + Instagram), lead form
Scope: one ad account, a 14-day paid validation, January 8-21, 2026
Ad spend: $853
Leads: 141 clicks and 9 inbound leads
Booked estimates: 4 of 9 leads - about $213 per booked in-home estimate
Best week: $55 cost per lead at a 1.64% CTR

My role: I and my team ran this as a paid-channel validation - offer and audience research, campaign and audience structure, creative concepts and ad copy, the lead form, daily budget and performance management, and the lead-by-lead follow-up tracking that turned form fills into booked appointments.
Average cost per lead: $94.80 across the test - $55 in the best week.
Revenue and ROAS: not tracked in this report, so this case does not claim them.

Where Things Stood at the Start

A New Jersey remodeling contractor that designs and builds fully finished basements - framing to final details, typically in about 45 days, with a five-year workmanship warranty and 15+ years behind the crew. The work and the crews were not the problem. Predictable demand was - which is why the owner came to me and my team to find out whether a paid channel could fill the schedule.
A six-figure product, no paid channel
A finished basement is a large, considered purchase. The company had never proven that paid social could reach the right homeowner at a price that made sense - and nobody wants to learn that by burning a five-figure budget.
Interest, not intent
Nobody searches for a basement remodel the way they search for an emergency plumber. The demand has to be created: the homeowner has to be shown that the largest unused room in the house is worth something.
The wrong homeowner is expensive
A lead from the wrong ZIP code costs exactly as much as a lead from a $3M property and is worth a fraction of it. Targeting had to buy the right address, not the cheapest click.
Form fills are not appointments
In this niche the number that matters is the booked in-home estimate. Without disciplined day-by-day follow-up logging, a lead is just a row in a spreadsheet.

What We Did

One ad account, one offer, one state - a deliberately small, deliberately fast validation.
Here is what actually moved the numbers.
Analyzed the business, the offer and the buying process, and built the campaign around the strongest commercial hook - a free design and estimate with a 45-day build
Targeted homeowners in the top 5-10% New Jersey ZIP codes rather than a broad statewide audience
Built the lead form around qualifying questions - approximate basement size and preferred estimate date - so the sales team could triage before calling
Tested two creative formats against the same audience: a single-image "your basement is wasted space" ad and a carousel
Managed budget daily and re-weighted spend toward the format and messaging that produced qualified conversations
Tracked every lead through a logged Day 1-Day 5 call and SMS follow-up sequence, so the reporting measured booked estimates, not form fills

The Results

Fourteen days of delivery, January 8-21, 2026. Spend, impressions, clicks, CTR, CPC and leads come straight from the campaign report. Booked estimates come from the lead-by-lead follow-up log kept with the client. Revenue and ROAS were not tracked in this report, so they are not claimed here.
  • Total ad spend: $853 across 14 days of delivery
  • 14,358 impressions and 141 clicks at a 0.98% CTR - $6.05 average cost per click
  • 9 inbound leads at a $94.80 average cost per lead
  • Best week (Jan 8-11): $166 spend, 3 leads, $55 cost per lead at a 1.64% CTR
  • 4 of 9 leads (44%) became booked appointments and received estimates - about $213 per booked estimate
  • Client-reported: one project closed on an approximately $3M property, with an estimated project value of around $200,000
Meta Ads campaign report, Jan 8-21, 2026: $853 spend, 9 leads, $95 cost per lead, 141 clicks
The campaign report itself, Jan 8-21, 2026: $853 ad spend, 14,358 impressions, 141 clicks, 9 leads at a $95 average cost per lead. Best week (Jan 8-11): $166 spend, 3 leads at $55 CPL and a 1.64% CTR. Client name and lead details removed; the Revenue and ROAS columns were never filled.
Lead outcomes funnel: 14,358 impressions, 141 clicks, 9 leads, 4 booked in-home estimates at about $213 each
From impression to appointment: 14,358 impressions, 141 clicks, 9 leads, 4 booked in-home estimates - about $213 per booked estimate. Eight of the nine leads came from the single-image ad. Booked estimates come from the lead-by-lead Day 1-Day 5 follow-up log kept with the client.

The Key Insight

At an $853 test budget, the interesting number is not the cost per lead. It is the cost per booked estimate - about $213 - in a category where a single signed project runs into six figures. That is the ratio that tells an owner whether the channel is worth funding, and it is the reason a test this small was still able to answer a big question.
Three things drove it.
The format did the selling, not the budget. Eight of the nine leads came from one single-image ad built on a single uncomfortable observation: the basement is the largest unused room in the house. The carousel produced one. That is a creative result, not a spend result - and it is the cheapest kind of insight to buy, because it costs a fortnight rather than a quarter.
The audience bought the address. Concentrating on the top 5-10% ZIP codes rather than the whole state is what put a $3M property into a nine-lead list. In a high-ticket trade, targeting is not an efficiency lever, it is a revenue lever: the same cost per lead against the wrong homeowner is simply a worse business.
Follow-up is where the money is. Nine leads became four booked estimates because every one of them was worked through a logged Day 1-Day 5 call and SMS sequence. The leads that went cold in the report are the ones that went unanswered twice on day one. Meta Ads bought the conversation. The follow-up is what turned it into an appointment.
And the honest limit of this test: two weeks and nine leads is a direction, not a forecast. The client reported that one project closed out of it, on an approximately $3M property with an estimated value of around $200,000 - their account, not a tracked figure, because revenue was never in the report. The next step is not a bigger budget. It is revenue tracking in a CRM, so the next $853 can be judged on closed projects instead of booked estimates.
Free Consultation Request
Watch the welcome video.
I explain the marketing problems companies run into most often, and when I can genuinely help.
Watch the short welcome video before you fill out the form
Please fill out every field carefully so that I or my assistant can get in touch with you.
Which service are you interested in?
​